Reputation Advocate Reviews Ripoff Report

Reputation Advocate Reviews Ripoff Report

Whenever a potential client contacts our office, Reputation Advocate reviews a number of variables in order to determine how challenging the suppression efforts might be. As Reputation Advocate reviews the origins of the negative content, it is important to determine the date of the original complaint. Determining the freshness of the slander is key in defining a strategy. Additionally, Reputation Advocate reviews comments that may have been added to the original complaint.

Often, the Reputation Advocate reviews team discovers that additional comments added by the client have actually contributed to the strength of the negative posting. In all cases, this is detrimental to a suppression effort. Even when content posted is misleading, only partially true or outright deceitful, it is never in client’s best interest to respond. The Reputation Advocate reviews team also notes the number of times that the search phrase has been included within the content of the posting. The more frequently a search term is mentioned, the more challenging the project.

Reputation Advocate reviews the actual content of the original complaint to determine if there have been violations of the sites Term Of Service (TOS). When the Reputation Advocate reviews team carefully notes the content posted against the client and evaluates it in the context of what the site allows, it is not uncommon to discover violations. This may provide an opportunity to contact the website and deliver a Takedown Demand Letter on behalf of our client.

Reputation Advocate reviews any information available that may indicate the identity of the individual who posted the original complaint. While this is seldom available, if discovered it may allow a client to pursue relief through the courts. It is important to note that sites like Ripoff Report stand squarely on the First Amendment and are thus immune from being required to remove content, however there are instances where the courts have provided financial penalties against a party if he/she can be conclusively defined as the party posting the slander.

The internal and external backlink structure must also be evaluated as Reputation Advocate reviews the level of difficulty that a proposed project will present. The team at Reputation Advocate reviews both internal and external backlinks, since both impact the authority that the posting initially holds with the search algorithms.

Additionally, the team at Reputation Advocate reviews a complaint to determine if a phone number if listed for the client. This may also be false but at times can actually deliver the Ripoff Report within the search results when searching a client’s phone number.

Another variable requiring evaluation is the total word count for all complaints, comments and rebuttals. According to the Reputation Advocate reviews team, search algorithms value not only the freshness of content but also the volume of content. Many times an initial complaint posting may accumulate dozens of additional comments that both defend and attack the person mentioned. Since algorithms are amoral and there is no attempt to implement sentiment analysis, the total word count, whether positive or negative, contributes to the overall authority of the site for page ranking purposes.

Reputation Advocate reviews several other aspects of the negative posting as well. If the client has been the victim of more than one complaint, there may be additional Ripoff Reports appearing within the client’s search results. As the team at Reputation Advocate reviews search engine results, it can clarify how malicious an attacker has been. Many times a client can have several complaints all offered by different parties, with different dates. All of these complaints are aggregated into a directory listing for “convenience” purposes. These directory listings can be deadly to a client’s online reputation.

While all of this evaluation may seem a bit complex, the team at Reputation Advocate believes it is necessary. Reputation Advocate reviews are needed to evaluate the level of damage that has been done to the client. Reputation Advocate reviews are required to determine the level of complexity of the project. Reputation Advocate reviews are needed so that we as a company can better advise our clients on how best to respond, or not respond. Reputation Advocate reviews must be done to insure that all aspects of the complaint contributing to the postings pagerank are identified and known as a project begins. Finally, Reputation Advocate reviews are needed so that our team members can empathize with the damage and pain that is being experienced by a client.

While it may at first seem excessive that the team at Reputation Advocate reviews so many dynamics, we believe this type of evaluation sets us apart from our competitors. It has been said that it is always best to measure twice and cut once. Within the world of online reputation management, proper consideration at the beginning of a client project allows our team to set proper expectations and understand more fully what will be required in order to achieve the client’s goals.




 

 

 


RipOff Report.com  |  Complaints.com  |  ConsumerAffairs.com  |  TheSqueakyWheel.com  |  ConsumerWebWatch.org  |  Ripoffonline.com |  Complaintsboard.com  My3Cents.com  |  Ripoff.com  |  PissedConsumer.com  |  Canyoutrustthem.com  |  Blog Post Removal  |  Negative Search Result  |  iripoff.com  | myfoxla.com  Bustathief.com  |  GetSatisfaction.com  |  ComplaintCenter.com  |  Complaints.com  |  BadDeals.com  |  PlanetFeedback.com  |  Angieslist.com  |  yelp.com
All trademarks and logos are rights of their legal owners.

© 2007-2013 Reputation Advocate Inc. To learn more, visit Reputation Advocate at http://www.reputationadvocate.com